Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR110 13
Original file (NR110 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD BLDG 12, SUITE 10014

ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

JRE
Docket No. 110-1
December 16, 2

ly WwW

oO

4
+

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10. of .the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 December 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered a
letter dated 27 January 2012 to you from the Combat Related
Special Compensation Board (CRSCB) .-

after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the rationale of the CRSCB. The Board was not
persuaded that either of your disabilities is attributable to a
specific combat-related event. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such

that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and

Printed on &) Recycled Paper
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Ww. sin A
Executive rector

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11982-08

    Original file (11982-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2009, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative reguiations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09382-09

    Original file (09382-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when naval record, the burden applying for a correction of an official ence of probable material is on the applicant to demonstrate the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04057-04

    Original file (04057-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In addition, theBoard noted that even if your back and neck disabilities were to be classified as...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10084-09

    Original file (10084-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10084-09 18 June 2010 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the‘ provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552: A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in’ support thereof, your naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03279-04

    Original file (03279-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03418-04

    Original file (03418-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    03418-04 18 March 2005This is in reference to your application for correction of your late husband’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member pa el of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting n executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, our husband’s naval record...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10128-08

    Original file (10128-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board was not persuaded that the condition was incurred under the circumstances specified in your application.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06206-07

    Original file (06206-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch , Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards (CORE), dated 29 December 2006, that your condition is not related to exposure to Agent Orange, or otherwise combat-related.After careful...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1148 13

    Original file (NR1148 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015S. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04855-07

    Original file (04855-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, the Board concurred with the finding of the Combat Related Special Compensation...